Comparative Antisickling Activity and Pharmacognostic Characterisation of Spondias mombin Leaf and Stem Bark

Ololade Adesomi Oyedapo

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Timothy Oluwatise Olakanmi

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Samuel Oluwatobiloba Adefila

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Nafisat Omolola Adigun

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

David Olaoluwa Akinkunmi

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Janet Adeola Fasakin

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Mojisola C. Cyril-Olutayo *

Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: This study aims to comparatively evaluate the antisickling activity and pharmacognostic characteristics of the leaves and stem bark of Spondias mombin, with a view to providing scientific evidence for their potential use in sickle cell disease management and establishing diagnostic parameters for their identification and standardisation.

Place and Duration of Study: Drug Research and Production Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, between October 2024 and September 2025.

Methodology: Dried plant materials were extracted with 70% ethanol, freeze-dried, and reconstituted in phosphate-buffered saline. Inhibitory and reversal antisickling assays were performed on HbSS erythrocytes at concentrations of 2 and 4 mg/mL using sodium metabisulphite-induced sickling. Cytotoxicity was assessed by percentage haemolysis and methaemoglobin (MetHb) formation, while pharmacognostic authentication was performed using standard anatomical procedures.

Results: Both extracts demonstrated notable antisickling activity, although their effects varied with concentration and incubation time. SML exhibited higher inhibition at 2 mg/mL in the 4-h batch (47 ± 2.43%) than in the 1-h batch (38 ± 4.11%), while activity at 4 mg/mL was comparable between batches (44 ± 1.97% vs. 44 ± 0.08%). For SMB, inhibition was similar at 2 mg/mL between the 1-h and 4-h batches (33 ± 5.76% vs. 34 ± 2.14%), but markedly higher at 4 mg/mL in the 4-h batch (72 ± 1.32%) than in the 1-h batch (45 ± 4.66%). In reversal assays, SML showed concentration-dependent activity, increasing from approximately 12 ± 4.58% reversal at 2 mg/mL to 58 ± 4.14% at 4 mg/mL, whereas SMB demonstrated approximately 54 ± 5.46% reversal at 2 mg/mL but decreased sharply to about 9 ± 3.24% at 4 mg/mL. Haemolysis values remained below 2% for both extracts across all concentrations tested, indicating low cytotoxicity. MetHb formation increased with concentration, ranging from 4–12% for SML and 8–17% for SMB. Anatomical studies revealed diagnostic features including unicellular trichomes, crystal druses, dorsiventral mesophyll, tannin-containing cells, sclereids, tyloses, and secretory ducts.

Conclusion: Spondias mombin leaf and stem bark extracts possess promising antisickling potential with minimal cytotoxicity, supporting their possible development as plant-derived therapeutic agents for sickle cell disease management.

Keywords: Spondias mombin, antisickling activity, sickle cell disease, HbSS erythrocytes, haemolysis, methaemoglobin, pharmacognostic characterisation, leaf anatomy, stem bark anatomy, medicinal plant standardization, sickle cell disease management


How to Cite

Oyedapo, Ololade Adesomi, Timothy Oluwatise Olakanmi, Samuel Oluwatobiloba Adefila, Nafisat Omolola Adigun, David Olaoluwa Akinkunmi, Janet Adeola Fasakin, and Mojisola C. Cyril-Olutayo. 2026. “Comparative Antisickling Activity and Pharmacognostic Characterisation of Spondias Mombin Leaf and Stem Bark”. Asian Journal of Biology 22 (10):26-40. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajob/2026/v22i10698.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.